Mealey's Data Privacy : Mealey's : Legal News & Analysis

Mealey's Data Privacy

June 15, 2023
Asbestos Expert’s Employer Seeks To Quash Study Subject Subpoena, Impose Sanctions

NEW YORK — Asbestos expert Jacqueline Moline’s employer on June 14 asked a court to quash a subpoena from a party to a suit, saying the information the defendant sought was already largely available and that production would violate health information privacy regulations and asking that the court impose sanctions.
June 14, 2023
Vizio Tells 9th Circuit Its 4th Amended Complaint Is ‘More Than Sufficient’

SAN FRANCISCO — Responding to an insurer’s contention that its appeal “merely regurgitates the same failed arguments,” Vizio Inc. tells the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals that the allegations in its fourth amended complaint are “more than sufficient” to permit it to proceed past the pleading stage in its lawsuit seeking coverage for an underlying $17 million settlement and defense costs arising from class claims alleging unauthorized collections of consumers’ television viewing data.
June 13, 2023
Taco Bell Worker Seeks Reconsideration After Biometric Data Arbitration Order

EAST ST. LOUIS, Ill. — A Taco Bell employee who alleges in a putative class complaint in a federal court in Illinois that workers’ biometric data is collected, used and stored in violation of that state’s law moved for reconsideration or clarification after an arbitration motion was granted, arguing that the court should decide rather than stay a personal jurisdiction motion and clarify whether the defendants in the case may enforce an arbitration agreement under the applicable delegation clause.
June 13, 2023
New York Woman Dismisses Class Suit Over Starbucks’ Biometric Data Collection

NEW YORK — A New York woman who filed a putative class complaint in a federal court in her state accusing Starbucks Corp. of violating New York City law by collecting and sharing biometric identifier information of all customers who enter the marketplace or lounge seating areas of the Starbucks-Amazon Go stores filed a notice of voluntary dismissal without prejudice.
June 12, 2023
Amazon, FTC Settle Child Privacy Violations Suit For $25 Million

SEATTLE — The same day that the Federal Trade Commission filed a complaint in Washington federal court against Amazon.com Inc. and Amazon.com Services LLC (Amazon, collectively) for violations of federal child privacy and consumer laws, the commission also filed a consent motion for entry of a stipulated order by which the online retailer will, among other things, pay $25 million to settle the claims related to its Alexa digital assistant.
June 09, 2023
$2.35M Dickey’s Barbecue Data Breach Class Settlement Granted Final Approval

DALLAS — A federal judge in Texas granted final approval of a $2.35 million nonreversionary settlement to be paid by Dickey’s Barbecue Restaurants Inc. to end several consolidated data breach class complaints.
June 08, 2023
Supreme Court: Identity Theft Occurs When ID Use Is ‘At The Crux’ Of Criminal Act

WASHINGTON, D.C. — Violation of the federal aggravated identity theft statute happens when the unauthorized use of another person’s means of identification “is at the crux of what makes the conduct” at issue criminal, a U.S. Supreme Court majority ruled June 8, reversing a Fifth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals’ ruling in the context of health care fraud and stressing that a broader interpretation of identity theft would transform “garden-variety overbilling” disputes that include the use of a patient’s identifying information into identity theft violations.
May 25, 2023
Indiana’s Suit Over TikTok’s Purported Data Sharing Sent Back To State Court

FORT WAYNE, Ind. — TikTok Inc. failed to establish that federal question jurisdiction exists in a lawsuit brought against it by the state of Indiana over the alleged sharing of the personal data of its social network users with the Chinese government, an Indiana federal judge ruled, holding that a claim against TikTok under a state consumer law does not require decisions about any federal issues, leading her to remand the case to state court.
May 25, 2023
Panel: Insured Fails To Show That Insurer’s Phone Recording Was Surreptitious

CHICAGO — An Illinois appeals court concluded May 24 that a bakery and catering company insured failed to allege facts to support its argument that a commercial general liability insurer’s recording of a phone conversation between a claim representative and the insured’s attorney was surreptitious, affirming a lower court’s dismissal of the insured’s lawsuit alleging that the insurer violated Illinois Eavesdropping Statute.
May 25, 2023
Parties In Meta Pixel Privacy Suit Told To Confer, Agree On ESI Preservation

SAN FRANCISCO — In a March 10 motion, Meta Platforms Inc. asks a California federal court to relate an 11th case with 10 already related cases in which patients of various hospitals and medical facilities have brought suit against the Facebook operator for purportedly installing its Pixel tool on the health care facilities’ respective online patient portals, thereby allowing it to surreptitiously collect patients’ protected health information (PHI).
May 22, 2023
4th Amendment Question Over Pole Camera Surveillance Rejected By Supreme Court

WASHINGTON, D.C. — A Massachusetts woman whose home was the subject of an eight-month surveillance by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) saw her petition for certiorari denied by the U.S. Supreme Court on May 22, leaving unanswered her question on whether such long-term surveillance via a pole camera violated her rights under the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.
May 22, 2023
Twitter Denied Rehearing Bid In 9th Circuit Appeal Over FBI Surveillance Report

SEATTLE — The Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals won’t rehear en banc its ruling that the Federal Bureau of Investigation properly invoked national security concerns when it prevented Twitter Inc. from publicizing a report on its involvement in government surveillance activities, thus permitting a panel ruling from March to stand.
May 12, 2023
Taco Bell Worker’s Biometric Data Collection Class Suit Ordered To Arbitration

EAST ST. LOUIS, Ill. — A federal judge in Illinois granted a restaurant service group and its related entities’ motion for arbitration in a putative class complaint by a Taco Bell employee who alleges that workers’ biometric data is collected, used and stored in violation of Illinois law, finding that the employee herself argued that the signatory to the arbitration agreement, a nonparty to the suit, has an agency relationship with the defendants.
May 05, 2023
Class Suit Accuses Starbucks Of Violating New York City Biometric Collection Law

NEW YORK — Starbucks Corp. violates New York City’s “Biometric Identifier Information Law” by collecting and sharing the biometric identifier information of all customers who enter the marketplace or lounge seating areas of the Starbucks-Amazon Go stores, a New York woman alleges in her class complaint filed in a federal court in New York on May 4.
May 05, 2023
Alexa Users Denied Bid To Amend Amazon Voice Data Collection Suit

SEATTLE — A putative class complaint alleging state and common-law claims against Amazon.com Inc. for its use of customer data collected via its Alexa digital assistant products in targeted ads will not be amended, a Washington federal judge ruled, denying the lead plaintiffs’ amendment motion that was filed in the wake of a dismissal ruling.
May 04, 2023
Employer, Employee Reach Undisclosed Settlement In Searched Texts Case

PHILADELPHIA — An employer and an employee who sued alleging that his personal text messages dating back more than a year were searched by his employer before his firing filed a stipulation of dismissal with prejudice in a federal court in Pennsylvania after reaching an undisclosed settlement.
May 04, 2023
7th Circuit Affirms Dismissal Of Genetic Privacy Claims Against Ancestry.com Buyer

INDIANAPOLIS — Two clients of Ancestry.com DNA LLC provided only “sparse allegations” that an investment firm that purchased the genealogy-tracing company violated the nondisclosure requirements of the Illinois Genetic Information Privacy Act (GIPA), a Seventh Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals panel found, affirming a trial court’s dismissal of their putative class complaint for failure to state a claim.
May 03, 2023
ACLU, EFF Back Twitter’s Rehearing Bid In Suit Over Reporting On FBI Surveillance

SEATTLE — The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and several ACLU affiliates collaborated on an amicus curiae brief supporting Twitter Inc.’s petition for rehearing en banc by the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals over a gag order precluding it from going public about its compliance with FBI surveillance orders, with the amici asserting that a panel’s ruling in favor of the government supported the imposition of “a quintessential prior restraint” that infringed Twitter’s First Amendment rights.
May 03, 2023
Match Group’s Discovery, Seal Motions Denied In FTC Enforcement Action

WASHINGTON, D.C. — Match Group Inc. failed to establish that the Federal Trade Commission initiated an action to enforce a civil investigative demand (CID) with improper motives, a District of Columbia federal magistrate judge ruled, denying the dating website operator’s motion to conduct related discovery, while also denying the company’s motion to seal the proceedings in which the FTC seeks documents related to its investigation of the purported sharing of users’ pictures and information with a facial recognition firm.
May 02, 2023
ACA Asbestos Program Suit Parties Parry Bid To Quash Subpoenas To U.S. Agencies

MISSOULA, Mont. — The United States says in a motion to quash that an agency already produced almost all the information two subpoenas seek and that further searches into whether a medical facility meets the criteria for “qualified physicians” under a special Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act program involving Libby, Mont., asbestos exposures “will simply waste time while yielding ever diminishing returns.” But in a joint response, the parties in the federal litigation in Montana say the subpoenas are not burdensome and that to the extent the answers to the subpoena questions are self-evident, the questions should be easy to answer.
May 02, 2023
Dismissal Granted In Class Suit Accusing GameStop Of Sharing Web Chat Data

SAN DIEGO — A retail gaming company accused of sharing web chat conversations with a third party falls within the “party exception” of federal and state privacy statutes, a federal judge in California ruled, dismissing putative class claims brought by a customer who alleges that his and others’ personal information was improperly shared.
May 02, 2023
Surveilled Woman Tells High Court ATF’s Pole Camera Violated 4th Amendment

WASHINGTON, D.C. — The eight-month surveillance of her home via a pole camera installed by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) ran afoul of the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, a Massachusetts woman asserts in a May 1 reply brief supporting her petition for certiorari, telling the U.S. Supreme Court that the government inappropriately seeks to apply older precedent to “newer privacy-invading surveillance technologies.”
May 01, 2023
Deposition On Discovery Burden Ordered In Harriet Carter Data Collection Suit

PITTSBURGH — Granting in part a motion to compel discovery, a Pennsylvania federal judge found that the lead plaintiff in a putative class action over Harriet Carter Gifts Inc.’s purported data gathering was entitled to discovery about user information sent from the retailer’s website to a business partner, but citing uncertainty about whether it was burdensome, the judge ordered a deposition of a company representative to make that determination.
April 27, 2023
On 2nd Try, $37.5 Million Facebook Tracking Settlement Preliminarily Approved

SAN FRANCISCO — Four months after denying the first motion for approval filed by the plaintiffs in a privacy class action over Meta Platforms Inc.’s purported tracking of Facebook users’ locations, a California federal judge on April 26 granted preliminary approval to a proposed $37.5 million settlement.
April 27, 2023
Android Users Tell 9th Circuit Data-Gathering Claims Against Google Were Proper

SAN FRANCISCO — Two smartphone users tell the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals in an appellant brief that a California federal judge wrongly dismissed their fraud and unfair competition claims against Google LLC for allegedly collecting data on third-party app usage via its Android operating system (OS) without notice, writing that the judge wrongly found the secure storage of their private data “not ‘central’” to the “functionality” of a smartphone.